hate to interfere in this thread again but I must emphasize again simply going against the public will not be greatly profitable. Trust me, its not that simple.
For example if you checked wagerline's archived consensus for plays with a 60% or higher consensus you will notice the plays are virtually hitting at 50%.
Secondary I must question where you are getting your infomation on who the "public" is on.
Can assure you New Mexico and Troy are not heavy public plays...
Don't want to come off as a ******* here, really just trying to help.
gl
For example if you checked wagerline's archived consensus for plays with a 60% or higher consensus you will notice the plays are virtually hitting at 50%.
Secondary I must question where you are getting your infomation on who the "public" is on.
Can assure you New Mexico and Troy are not heavy public plays...
Don't want to come off as a ******* here, really just trying to help.
gl
HPark, most everyone here is aware that the info I provide comes strictly from this book, unless stated otherwise and we have primarily a very big square group betting.
You are absolutely right that going against the public every time is not necessarily profitable, although it could be, it isnt, therefore you must also exercise judgement. Dont simply bet blindly because we're heavy on someone...
You are absolutely right that going against the public every time is not necessarily profitable, although it could be, it isnt, therefore you must also exercise judgement. Dont simply bet blindly because we're heavy on someone...
