Are your super chalky MLB plays part of this record? IF so, why don't you also keep record of units won/loss.. Or $ won/loss? Or ROI? Something/ anything that actually demonstrates accurate representation incorporating any losses on high chalk plays to paint a transparent complete picture of the results. The way you're doing it now is very misleading.
Are your super chalky MLB plays part of this record? IF so, why don't you also keep record of units won/loss.. Or $ won/loss? Or ROI? Something/ anything that actually demonstrates accurate representation incorporating any losses on high chalk plays to paint a transparent complete picture of the results. The way you're doing it now is very misleading.
If what I'm doing now is so misleading?? Why did u click on my thread??
Read his previous post's as i did & you will get your answer! gl.
First off the way you post your record would seem to be for that sport. 2nd stanford +4 was never available at 5dimes or anywhere else so you you should note what you are paying for +4. Just like -6.5 was never available on cincy last night. Maybe you should read the rules for posting which clearly say you should post numbers that are available. Do you agree that losing a play that is chalk at -180 is different than a spread bet at -110 in football?
First off the way you post your record would seem to be for that sport. 2nd stanford +4 was never available at 5dimes or anywhere else so you you should note what you are paying for +4. Just like -6.5 was never available on cincy last night. Maybe you should read the rules for posting which clearly say you should post numbers that are available. Do you agree that losing a play that is chalk at -180 is different than a spread bet at -110 in football?