:toast:
My pleasure, sir.
All writeups in this thread so far are courtesy of "S", though i may use also other writers writeups in the future.
"S" writes up many more games than are posted in this topic, but i select those that i personally like the sound of.
His overall long term records were posted earlier in the thread. Post #12.
Overall "S" is up about 50 units in MLB since 2004.
In NCAAF he's quite a lot better, up about +150 units.
In NCAAB even more, up around +170 units.
College sports may be his best, or at least near the top.
He also provides picks in NFL, NHL, CFL, golf, MMA, etc.
Picks are generally 2 units apiece.
In NCAAF he's quite a lot better, up about +150 units.
In NCAAB even more, up around +170 units.
College sports may be his best, or at least near the top.
He also provides picks in NFL, NHL, CFL, golf, MMA, etc.
Picks are generally 2 units apiece.
"S"'s Golf picks record is only since 2016. His MMA since 2006. CFL since 2005. All his other sports records are since 2004.
In Golf he's + 30 units overall.
MLB: about +50 units.
NFL around +50 units won.
CFL - Canadian Football League - about +20 units.
NHL +100 units.
NBA around -140 units.
MMA about +15 units.
In NCAAF approximately +150 units.
In NCAAB nearly +170 units.
College sports are his best.
Picks are generally 2 units apiece.
And all of them have always been absolutely free!
In Golf he's + 30 units overall.
MLB: about +50 units.
NFL around +50 units won.
CFL - Canadian Football League - about +20 units.
NHL +100 units.
NBA around -140 units.
MMA about +15 units.
In NCAAF approximately +150 units.
In NCAAB nearly +170 units.
College sports are his best.
Picks are generally 2 units apiece.
And all of them have always been absolutely free!
----------------------------------------------
Info FYI & consideration.
Someone's opinion, FYI & consideration.
Fade or follow or neither. Your choice, your responsibility. BOL.
"Past Performance Is No Guarantee of Future Results"
"Past success is no guarantee of future success"
"Wagering on sports can be a roller coaster ride."
"Passing is not winning, but passing is always better than losing!"
“Show me someone who has never failed, and I will show you a coward.”
"I don't advise to fade or follow anything. I report & track to let you decide."
“…it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!”
7-1 +10.17 units the last 8 @ 1 unit per pick.
Or +20.24 units @ 2 units per pick, as some people pad their unit amounts.
Or +40.48 units @ 4 units per pick, as some people artificially inflate their unit amounts.
Or +101.70 units @ 10 units per pick, as some scumbag touts & other people superficially pad their unit amounts.
----------------------------------------------
Info FYI & consideration.
Someone's opinion, FYI & consideration.
Fade or follow or neither. Your choice, your responsibility. BOL.
"Past Performance Is No Guarantee of Future Results"
"Past success is no guarantee of future success"
"Wagering on sports can be a roller coaster ride."
"Passing is not winning, but passing is always better than losing!"
“Show me someone who has never failed, and I will show you a coward.”
"I don't advise to fade or follow anything. I report & track to let you decide."
“…it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!”
Sherwood frustrates me. He continues to do the -1.5 runlines when ive noticed soo many times he would have won playing teams just moneyline. Not to mention, he contradicts so many times. He has great writeups, but youll notice the contradictory part and he'll sway the message towards whoever he bets on. And keep in mind, hes lost tons of units every season in every sport for the past 3 years.
The flip side of that is the reward for -1.5 lines is so much better.
One could compromise & play -1 instead of -1.5, as some people like to do.
Since his writeups seem so heavily based on the pitcher/s, i wonder if he'd do better with F3, F5, F7 lines.
Not sure what you mean. Can you give an example?
Actually his site says:
"In 2020, we ended +117 units for our 9th winning season in past 11 years. "
In NCAAF the last 3 years:
| 2018 | 71-69-0 (+14.00) |
| 2019 | 71-68-0 (+14.00) |
| 2020 | 63-51-0 (+25.00) |
<tbody>
</tbody>
In NFL the last 3 years:
| 2018 | 81-57-0 (+64.00) |
| 2019 | 65-59-0 (+16.00) |
| 2020 | 55-62-0 (-14.00) |
<tbody>
</tbody>
In NCAAB the last 3 years:
| 2018 | 109-95-0 (+30.00) |
| 2019 | 51-53-0 (-7.00) |
| 2020 | 101-70-0 (+64.00) |
<tbody>
</tbody>
The flip side of that is the reward for -1.5 lines is so much better.
One could compromise & play -1 instead of -1.5, as some people like to do.
I would believe this if he werent down 30+ units. Also hes had two days ive tracked where he didnt count his losses. Samething last year too. Hes actually pretty honest so Id assume he just forgot, but the record isnt acccurate. Trust me im a big advocate of his write ups. Absolutely love them, but i ususally make my own plays based off his write ups.
One could compromise & play -1 instead of -1.5, as some people like to do.
I would believe this if he werent down 30+ units. Also hes had two days ive tracked where he didnt count his losses. Samething last year too. Hes actually pretty honest so Id assume he just forgot, but the record isnt acccurate. Trust me im a big advocate of his write ups. Absolutely love them, but i ususally make my own plays based off his write ups.
Not to mention, he contradicts so many times. He has great writeups, but youll notice the contradictory part and he'll sway the message towards whoever he bets on.
Not sure what you mean. Can you give an example?
I cant, id have to look back and dont have that kind of time. , but ive been following him for years. Just read some of his writeups and youll see. I think there was one with Stroman how it was a fade on him bc he had a xERA 2 runs higher than his ERA and was due for regression. Stroman through a shut out, Sherwood lost. On stromans next start, he follows him saying something like hes on a good run or something, then Stroman got rocked.
It may not be that exact example but it was something like that.
Not sure what you mean. Can you give an example?
I cant, id have to look back and dont have that kind of time. , but ive been following him for years. Just read some of his writeups and youll see. I think there was one with Stroman how it was a fade on him bc he had a xERA 2 runs higher than his ERA and was due for regression. Stroman through a shut out, Sherwood lost. On stromans next start, he follows him saying something like hes on a good run or something, then Stroman got rocked.
It may not be that exact example but it was something like that.
You misunderstand. My statement has nothing to do with records, which BTW show him up about + 50 units in his overall MLB record since about 2004, but with the reward (or payout) the odds get a person. If you bet $100 on a +100 ML your reward for a win is only $100. If you bet the same amount on a -1.5 RL at +170, your reward is $170, way higher.
Furthermore this thread isn't about the guy writing the writeups, but about my specific selection of only a small number of those writeups that i like & have posted in this thread. Overall they are up in units and on a 7-1 winning run.
Additionally, BTW, i may add other authors writeups with their picks later.
Perhaps you're in error again as you were so far off regarding his records in your statement above that it's hilarious.
Furthermore his picks and records are posted in the public domain with thousands of eyes on them, so it's unlikely he wouldn't get corrected, even when there is a delay in updating the record. I've seen a delay a few times & it was always updated later.
He himself says when a pick that was a winner isn't graded he gets like one person telling him about it. But when a pick that was a loser is delayed in getting graded, many people contact him about it.
As far as you saying he's "actually pretty honest", he has a very solid rep over decades on this forum.
0-2 today, -2.00 units.
7-3, +8.17 units the last 10.
Or +16.34 units @ 2 units per pick, as some people pad their unit amounts.
Or +32.68 units @ 4 units per pick, as some people artificially inflate their unit amounts.
Or +81.70 units @ 10 units per pick, as some scumbag touts & other people superficially pad their unit amounts.
DETROIT -1½ +170 over Minnesota2:10 PM EST. Yesterday we ended our writeup on Milwaukee to beat Minnesota with this:Without going into a lot of detail, we like the situation for the Crew too, which we will elaborate on tomorrow in a game we’re 100% targeting.Well, this is “tomorrow” and this is the game we’re targeting, which goes back to an angle we have discussed before. Minnesota just played a interleague series with the Brewers and while it meant nothing to the Twins, it still had to be a little exciting to play a team so close in proximity that they rarely see. Surely some fans of the Crew made the 4 to 7-hour trip to see their team play in Minnesota. The Twinkies won the first two games of that series but more importantly, they had to fly out afterward for this early start in Detroit to make up for a rained out game earlier in the year. For the Twinkies, this is a one-game, one day stop to Detroit before they fly right back hom for a series against the Cubs starting tomorrow. We cannot overemphasize what an inconvenience this one-off game is. We’re sure that there isn’t a single person on the Twins’ roster that wants to make this one-day trip for an afternoon game in sweltering heat. To recap, the Twins schedule is/was three at home versus Milwaukee followed by one game in Detroit and then they'll be back home for a two-game set v the Cubs starting tomorrow. Baseball at this level takes 100% mental concentration or focus. Take away half that and it leaves a team extremely vulnerable. Also consider that the Twins are not in any playoff chase and it makes this game even more of a hassle for the entire squad. The pitching matchup matters not. The lineups matter not. This is a strong situational play on the Tigers that you should jump on ASAP because the fact that Detroit is an underdog (at the time of this writing) is absurd.
